Discovery
Interrogated the drop-off: what happens on May 1st, and who feels it first.
Key decision
Reframed the brief from 'campaign' to 'platform'.
Lesson learned
The brief you're handed is rarely the problem you have.

National Awareness Campaign
Turning one of the nation's largest awareness moments from a thirty-day spike into a year-round movement — through platform thinking, modular partner toolkits, and a sustained content rhythm.
Attention surged every April and collapsed in May — annual rebuilds burned budget, erased recognition equity, and left eleven quiet months of unleveraged partnerships.
I set the campaign vision, built the platform architecture, and coordinated the cross-functional machine required to sustain a national campaign continuously.
A flexible campaign identity, twelve-month editorial calendar, modular partner toolkits, mobile hub, environmental design, and quarterly executive reporting.
Twelve months of activation instead of one, hundreds of partners self-serving on-brand, and Q1 production capacity returned to strategic work.
Sustaining a campaign for twelve months is a fundamentally different design problem than peaking for thirty days.
Sexual Assault Awareness & Prevention Month concentrates the year's media coverage, partner activation, and donor attention into a single window. It is the organization's loudest moment — and its most temporary one.
Meanwhile the mission does not observe a calendar. Survivors reach out in November. Campuses need resources in September. Corporate partners plan in fiscal quarters. The campaign structure was working against the work.
Every year the identity was rebuilt from zero, partner toolkits shipped as static PDFs that couldn't flex to any real channel, and message discipline eroded the moment April ended.
People don't ignore important issues because they don't care.
They ignore them because they don't know what to do next.
Awareness was never the bottleneck. Actionability was. So the platform was built to give every audience — survivor, ally, campus, corporate — a specific next step in every single month.
365 Days.
One Mission.
One Conversation.
A persistent campaign platform with fixed anchors and seasonal expressions — recognizable in any month, adaptable in every channel, and intensified rather than initiated each April.
I designed the campaign as a platform with a persistent core and seasonal expressions — recognizable in any month, adaptable in every channel.
Prior-year performance analysis, partner feedback, and drop-off modeling to locate the real failure point.
Segmented messaging for survivors, allies, campus partners, and corporate sponsors.
A persistent narrative core with quarterly thematic expressions.
A flexible identity system with fixed anchors and variable surfaces.
A phone-first campaign hub with pledge flows and shareable assets.
Channel-native formats built for the platform, not resized from print.
A cadence mapped to the twelve-month calendar rather than April alone.
Campus activations, tabling kits, banners, and wayfinding for community partners.
Modular, localizable toolkits that hundreds of partners could deploy without design support.
Contrast, caption, and alt-text standards embedded directly into every template.
Every phase carried a decision that shaped the next — and a lesson that outlived the project.
Interrogated the drop-off: what happens on May 1st, and who feels it first.
Key decision
Reframed the brief from 'campaign' to 'platform'.
Lesson learned
The brief you're handed is rarely the problem you have.
Performance data, partner interviews, and channel analysis across the prior cycles.
Key decision
Prioritized partner usability over headquarters polish.
Lesson learned
The field is the real production team.
Built the messaging architecture, twelve-month calendar, and quarterly expression model.
Key decision
Locked a persistent core before designing anything.
Lesson learned
Recognition equity compounds only when something stays fixed.
Developed the platform concept and pressure-tested it in April and non-April scenarios.
Key decision
Required every concept to survive a quiet month.
Lesson learned
Design for the trough, not the peak.
Produced modular kits spanning social, print, email, web, environmental, and event formats.
Key decision
Shipped editable kits, not locked PDFs.
Lesson learned
Control is not the same as consistency.
Executive and partner review cycles run against usability criteria.
Key decision
Tested toolkits with real partners before launch.
Lesson learned
Partners find the failure modes headquarters can't see.
Executed the April peak across owned, earned, and partner channels simultaneously.
Key decision
Treated April as proof, not as the deliverable.
Lesson learned
A launch is a hypothesis test.
Activated quarterly rhythm and refined assets against engagement data.
Key decision
Rebalanced production capacity across the year.
Lesson learned
Smoothing the calendar was the quiet win nobody asked for.
The rollout proved the platform in April, then extended it deliberately across the remaining quarters.
Hover to enlarge. Click any piece for an immersive view.
CampaignOne system expressed natively across Instagram, LinkedIn, Stories, out-of-home, and partner toolkits.
Mobile ExperienceLanding pages, pledge forms, and shareables built for a phone-first audience.
ToolkitLocalizable kits that let hundreds of partners activate without breaking the brand.
StrategyTwelve months of themes, moments, and formats mapped before design began.
DashboardReach, partner adoption, and sustained engagement reported to leadership quarterly.
Environmental DesignPhysical expressions — banners, tabling, and wayfinding — for community partners.
PresentationThe always-on argument that replaced an annual thirty-day push.
I led the creative vision and coordinated the cross-functional machine required to keep a national campaign running continuously.
Set and defended the creative vision for a national, always-on campaign, holding a single standard across every surface and every team.
Translated creative decisions into business language so leadership could sponsor the work rather than react to it.
Brought programs, communications, development, and technology into one shared plan with one shared definition of done.
Designed intake, review, and delivery so quality was produced by the system, not rescued by heroics.
Scoped and sequenced spend against impact, delivering within existing operating budget without diluting ambition.
Ran structured working sessions that surfaced objections early and converted skeptics into advocates.
Selected partners, set specifications and quality gates, and owned accountability for external production.
Introduced AI-assisted production for routine work, redirecting the team's hours toward strategy and craft.
Made WCAG 2.1 AA an upstream design input, protecting both the audience and the institution.
Documented decision rights, escalation paths, and review cadence so speed never came at the cost of consistency.
Protected equity over time — treating the brand as an asset with a balance sheet, not a style preference.
Made the calls that unblocked the work, and made the reasoning visible so the team could make the next ones without me.
The platform changed both the audience relationship and the internal economics of the campaign.
0M+
People Reached
Across owned, earned, and partner channels
0%
Increase in Engagement
Year-over-year across campaign channels
0+
Media Placements
National and regional coverage
0%
Email Performance
Lift in open and click-through rates
0%
Social Sharing
Increase in partner and audience amplification
0
Months of Activation
Up from a single-month push
Hundreds
Partners Enabled
Self-serve, localizable toolkits
National
Recognition
Campaign adoption beyond the organization
In her own words
The instinct with an awareness campaign is to make it louder. I've never seen louder work. What I've seen work is making the next step obvious.
So the first thing I did was stop designing and go look at what happened on May 1st. The answer was: nothing. Partners who had been enthusiastic in April had no reason to post in May, because we'd never given them one. That's not an audience problem. That's a supply problem, and supply is a leadership responsibility.
The hardest tradeoff was giving up control of the assets. Sending editable toolkits into the field means some partner, somewhere, will stretch the logo. I decided that risk was smaller than the certainty of eleven silent months, and I built enough structure into the templates that the sloppy version still reads as ours.
The decision I'm proudest of is one nobody outside the team noticed: we redistributed production across the year. The Q1 crunch had been treated as a fact of nature. It wasn't — it was a consequence of the campaign model. Fixing the model gave a small team its capacity back, and capacity is what makes strategic work possible at all.
Anything that only works at peak intensity will not survive the quiet quarters. Sustainability is a design constraint.
Partners are the real channel. Making them self-sufficient multiplied reach far more than additional owned content would have.
Resisting the annual rebuild was the single highest-return decision — recognition is an asset you can only accumulate.
I would instrument partner-level usage analytics earlier to prioritize toolkit investment with harder evidence.
“She took the busiest month of our year and turned it into a system we can run every month. That changed what our partners are able to do with us.”
Modernized one of the nation's most recognized nonprofit brands through a research-led strategy, an accessible enterprise design system, and an adoption program that aligned every department behind a single identity. The work moved RAINN from fragmented, department-owned visuals to a coherent brand platform built to scale.
View Case StudyI build creative organizations that produce measurable business impact.